[Ssr2-review] Email replying to Board
aalain at trstech.net
Tue Oct 10 17:52:19 UTC 2017
> On 6 Oct 2017, at 05:24, jaberamatogoro at gmail.com wrote:
> Dear Co-chairs,
> It has my support. I am also proposing that we review Board concerns and give a clarification to each of the stated point. However, the language used in Board statement/SSAC I am not comfortable with it and is giving me different thinking about ICANN as organization.
> We are dedicating a good number of time to make sure that we are able to deliver best recommendation for the better of ICANN and the community we represent in the team, that only need to be appreciated.
I think both the board and SSAC do know and recognize our contribution here as volunteers. Board has been attentive to what we are doing and engage when needed.
We expect community inputs and observations and i appreciate SSAC voicing their concerns now as from their position of adviser on Security and Stability matters, they are important player when it comes to SSR.
Most of the us, if not all agreed that the “engines" not performing well and must be fixed.
> Sent from Windows Mail
> From: Denise Michel <mailto:denisemichel at fb.com>
> Sent: Thursday, October 5, 2017 6:17 PM
> To: SSR2 Review Team Email List <mailto:ssr2-review at icann.org>
> Dear Team Members:
> As discussed, the co-chairs are preparing a brief email reply to the Board’s latest correspondence regarding the ICANN SSR Subgroup fact-finding meeting in LA Oct 9-10. Because we are so short on time, we’ve outlined the points we’ll make and invite any Team members to provide any comments they may have by COB today (PT). After we send the email, we intend to follow-up with more discussion after the workshop and a more fulsome correspondence to the Board.
> SSR mandate from ICANN’s bylaws to provide increased accountability and transparency of ICANN to its community for key aspects of ICANN’s work
> SSR2’s terms of reference modelled on bylaws and adopted by majority consensus
> Workplan and sub-group efforts flow from ToR
> ICANN SSR subgroup’s fact-finding mission at ICANN addresses SSR2’s bylaw obligation.
> Note Board concern about risks of exceeding SSR2 scope; Team discussed potential for over-reach while creating ToR, and reinforced Team’s commitment with text on gaining complete understanding of interconnected issues but then ensuring SSR2 recommendations are in-scope.
> After subgroup’s Oct 9-10 fact-finding mission, Team will discuss results and next steps.
> Look forward to discussing all this with the Board at ICANN 60 and getting more information on Board’s concerns
> Denise & Eric
> Denise Michel
> Domain Name System Strategy & Management
> Facebook, Inc.
> denisemichel at fb.com <mailto:denisemichel at fb.com>
> Ssr2-review mailing list
> Ssr2-review at icann.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Ssr2-review