[Ssr2-review] [Ext] RE: Action item 126

Boban Krsic krsic at denic.de
Fri Sep 1 17:10:55 UTC 2017


Thanks Jennifer, would be great if we could get an process overview next week.

Wishing you all a relaxing weekend.

   - Boban 


> On 1. Sep 2017, at 18:34, Jennifer Bryce <jennifer.bryce at icann.org> wrote:
> 
> Hi James, all,
>  
> To follow-up on James’ point below, we wanted to let you know that we’re finalizing the process for review teams to access materials designated as confidential by respective SMEs. We’ll have the information available to share next week and we’ll be happy to walk through the process on a plenary call, if the Review Team would find this helpful.
>  
> Best,
> Jennifer
>  
> From: James Gannon <james at cyberinvasion.net>
> Date: Wednesday, August 30, 2017 at 10:09 AM
> To: Jennifer Bryce <jennifer.bryce at icann.org>, SSR2 <ssr2-review at icann.org>
> Subject: [Ext] RE: Action item 126
>  
> Hi Jennifer,
>  
> In this case then the respective SMEs and departments must make every effort to classify and categorise in advance of our meeting all potential documents that the team may request during the face to face, this will extend to all usual materials that would be requested by an auditor under normal business circumstances which the departments should be very familiar with.
>  
> Happy to provide additional details as required,
>  
> -James
>  
>  
> From: ssr2-review-bounces at icann.org [mailto:ssr2-review-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Jennifer Bryce
> Sent: 30 August 2017 16:56
> To: SSR2 <ssr2-review at icann.org>
> Subject: [Ssr2-review] Action item 126
>  
> Hi all,
>  
> Regarding action item 126: Request ICANN Legal to be present at ICANN SSR face-to-face meeting, October 9-10 to rule on availability of documents.
>  
> ICANN Legal cannot make on-the-spot decisions regarding access to individual documents, and will therefore not be present at the meeting to rule on availability of documents. The process that is followed for document requests is outlined in the revised Confidential Disclosure Framework and Non-Disclosure Agreement, circulated to the review team yesterday, 29 August.
>  
> As mentioned in the email yesterday, if you elect not to sign the NDA, there may be instances where you will be restricted from accessing, using or discussing any confidential information provided by ICANN under the NDA. We are working to determine how to best manage requests in this instance and can provide more information when available.
>  
> Please let us know if you have any questions.
>  
> Best,
>  
> Jennifer
> -- 
> Jennifer Bryce
> Senior Reviews Coordinator 
> Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN)
>  
> Email: jennifer.bryce at icann.org
> Skype: jennifer.bryce.icann
> www.icann.org[icann.org]
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ssr2-review/attachments/20170901/7cbe12a1/attachment.html>


More information about the Ssr2-review mailing list