[Ssr2-review] Discussion Item: ToR

[Russ Housley]

It does look like the second footnote is not needed.

Russ


> On Aug 30, 2018, at 11:44 AM, ALAIN AINA <aalain at trstech.net> wrote:
> 
> Laurin,
> 
> See the attached document with a quick comment. Otherwise looks ok.I look forward to the discussion on update to the  work plan.
> 
> Thanks
> 
> —Alain
> 
> <SSR2-TermsofReference-PreCall 18-8-30-v2.docx>
> 
> 
>> On 30 Aug 2018, at 01:38, Weissinger, Laurin <laurin.weissinger at yale.edu <mailto:laurin.weissinger at yale.edu>> wrote:
>> 
>> Dear all, 
>> 
>> After discussion last week and this week’s comment period, please see attached the updated Terms of Reference. 
>> 
>> With many thanks and best wishes
>> Laurin
>> 
>> 
>> <SSR2-TermsofReference-PreCall 18-8-30.docx>_______________________________________________
>> Ssr2-review mailing list
>> Ssr2-review at icann.org <mailto:Ssr2-review at icann.org>
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ssr2-review
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Ssr2-review mailing list
> Ssr2-review at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ssr2-review

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ssr2-review/attachments/20180830/439c0bb5/attachment.html>