[Ssr2-review] ACTION: Review work plan

[Matogoro Jabera]

Dear Jennifer and Colleagues,

Please check the percentages on the Research and Studies, it should read
78%
While English is not my first language but I am not comfortable with the
wording  "Inward Facing" and "Outward Facing ". Please let us using wording
that refer what has been instructed in our ToR and the Bylaws.

On the Research and Studies, we are missing "activities done by the review
team on this matter" If we remain silent then we will be missing scientific
proof to justify most of our recommendations. This was very critical to
identify some gaps in most of the activities carried out by this review.

Please let us address the above issues before sharing the document.


Regards,
MATOGORO Jabhera
Assistant Lecturer
College of Informatics and Virtual Education
The University of Dodoma
P.O Box 490,
Dodoma.
Website: www.udom.ac.tz
*IEEE Membership ID: 93934185*


On Thu, Nov 8, 2018 at 8:33 PM Jennifer Bryce <jennifer.bryce at icann.org>
wrote:

> Dear SSR2 RT members,
>
>
>
> The latest version of the work plan is attached. Please check over and
> raise any objections or edits on-list by 17:00 UTC on Friday 8 November.
> As noted on the call, unless objections are raised by the above date, this
> work plan will be considered to be adopted by the review team, and is the
> version that will be sent to the Board, SO/ACs, posted to the wiki.
>
>
>
> Note the intro text to the attached work plan states: “The Second
> Security, Stability, and Resiliency of the Domain Name System (SSR2) Review
> Team was confirmed in February 2017 and held its first Plenary meeting in
> March 2017. Its work was suspended by the ICANN Board in October 2017, and
> restarted in June 2018. This work plan subsequently was updated to reflect
> the work of SSR2 Review Team post-suspension, and previous work plans are
> archived on the SSR2 wiki.
>
>
>
> This work plan serves as a guide developed by the SSR2 Review Team as a
> plan for its work for the review focusing on key areas for research and
> discussion and related milestones to be achieved during the review process.
> The work plan is expected to evolve with the Review Team's work and will be
> updated as the work progresses. Dates reflect a typical Review lifecycle,
> but are to be adjusted by the Review Team, based upon their agreed-upon
> scope and the effort required to address highest-priority objectives within
> available budget and time.”
>
>
>
> Best,
>
> Jennifer
>
> --
>
> *Jennifer Bryce*
>
> Senior Reviews Coordinator
>
> Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN)
>
>
>
> Email: jennifer.bryce at icann.org
>
> Skype: jennifer.bryce.icann
>
> www.icann.org
> _______________________________________________
> Ssr2-review mailing list
> Ssr2-review at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ssr2-review
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ssr2-review/attachments/20181108/de515bcc/attachment.html>