[Ssr2-review] SSR1 Assessment Methodology

[k claffy]

I disagree with the last paragraph,
and think it undermines the entire assessment
and the review process.

Can you provide specific examples of recommendations
that you believe we did a crappy job of assessing?
Because that is what the current text implies.

If someone is not satisfied with the way these
assessments have been done, leadership should ask
them to work 2-3 specific examples of what they 
consider a satisfactory assessment of a recommendation.
Leadership could extend the same offer to anyone
on ICANN staff as well.

But we cannot write a report and then end it with
"it would take too long and too many resources
to do this accurately, so we didn't."

My specific suggestion is to remove the last
paragraph of the Limitations section.

k