[Ssr2-review] SSR1 Assessment Methodology

[Kerry-Ann Barrett]

Thanks so much Laurin for taking the first stab at the draft but agree with KC to the extent that we could phrase the limitations a little differently. 

Would anyone have any objections if I suggest some edits later today? 

I’ve been on the road but will be in Panama later today and will have some time later to add some suggested edits to the google doc. Let me know.

Cheers
Kerry-Ann

> On Nov 24, 2018, at 8:50 PM, k claffy <kc at caida.org> wrote:
> 
> 
> I disagree with the last paragraph,
> and think it undermines the entire assessment
> and the review process.
> 
> Can you provide specific examples of recommendations
> that you believe we did a crappy job of assessing?
> Because that is what the current text implies.
> 
> If someone is not satisfied with the way these
> assessments have been done, leadership should ask
> them to work 2-3 specific examples of what they 
> consider a satisfactory assessment of a recommendation.
> Leadership could extend the same offer to anyone
> on ICANN staff as well.
> 
> But we cannot write a report and then end it with
> "it would take too long and too many resources
> to do this accurately, so we didn't."
> 
> My specific suggestion is to remove the last
> paragraph of the Limitations section.
> 
> k
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Ssr2-review mailing list
> Ssr2-review at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ssr2-review