[Ssr2-review] SSR1 Assessment Methodology

[k claffy]

Kerry-Ann,

I would be happy to see that, thank you!

I did make some edits to the document, but had forgotten
to log in so they are either 'anonymous' or not going
to show up..

k


On Sun, Nov 25, 2018 at 10:43:19AM -0500, Kerry-Ann Barrett wrote:
 > Thanks so much Laurin for taking the first stab at the draft but agree with KC to the extent that we could phrase the limitations a little differently. 
 > 
 > Would anyone have any objections if I suggest some edits later today? 
 > 
 > I???ve been on the road but will be in Panama later today and will have some time later to add some suggested edits to the google doc. Let me know.
 > 
 > Cheers
 > Kerry-Ann
 > 
 > > On Nov 24, 2018, at 8:50 PM, k claffy <kc at caida.org> wrote:
 > > 
 > > 
 > > I disagree with the last paragraph,
 > > and think it undermines the entire assessment
 > > and the review process.
 > > 
 > > Can you provide specific examples of recommendations
 > > that you believe we did a crappy job of assessing?
 > > Because that is what the current text implies.
 > > 
 > > If someone is not satisfied with the way these
 > > assessments have been done, leadership should ask
 > > them to work 2-3 specific examples of what they 
 > > consider a satisfactory assessment of a recommendation.
 > > Leadership could extend the same offer to anyone
 > > on ICANN staff as well.
 > > 
 > > But we cannot write a report and then end it with
 > > "it would take too long and too many resources
 > > to do this accurately, so we didn't."
 > > 
 > > My specific suggestion is to remove the last
 > > paragraph of the Limitations section.
 > > 
 > > k
 > > 
 > > _______________________________________________
 > > Ssr2-review mailing list
 > > Ssr2-review at icann.org
 > > https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ssr2-review
 >