[Ssr2-review] Please review the first 5 SSR1 recommendations for the call tomorrow

k claffy kc at caida.org
Tue Sep 11 00:35:59 UTC 2018

On Mon, Sep 10, 2018 at 05:04:15PM -0400, Russ Housley wrote:
 > On the leadership call earlier today, we observed that the reason for our questions about the SSR1 recommendations is because it is not necessarily easy to determine what was done to implement the recommendations, and in some cases, the ICANN staff that did the implementation have moved on.  Negar pointed out that ICANN is putting together a way to better track the resolution of review team recommendations going forward.  The is good, and it will help future review teams, but it will not help us.

yes, negar covered this at the F2F.
i'm not convinced that means we should ignore
this issue for the purposes of evaluating
these recommendations.  

a related concern may motivate another question,
or modifying this one. whether the recommendation
is worded in a way that is amenable to assessment 
of its successful implementation.  so something like

"Is the recommendation phrased in way conducive to
assessment of its implementation?  

Maybe we can cover this with another question,
but I think we need to accommodate for recommendations
that are problematically vaguely worded... 


More information about the Ssr2-review mailing list