[Ssr2-review] name collision
kc at caida.org
Sat Jan 26 21:28:46 UTC 2019
Yes, this study was "management consulting" as opposed to
peer-reviewed scientific research. Board members had called
for something more "scientific" before another round.
My understanding is there is no resolution of what that
could mean or what the Board will actually fund.
Some existing peer-reviewed research on this topic (but
I'm not up to date, others may have additional pointers)
IEEE: "MitM Attack by Name Collision: Cause Analysis and
Vulnerability Assessment in the New gTLD Era", 2016,
CCS: "Client-side Name Collision Vulnerability in the New gTLD Era: A
Systematic Study", 2017, https://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=3134084
IEEE: "Leakage of .onion at the DNS Root: Measurements, Causes, and
Countermeasures", 2017, http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/7972981/
On Sat, Jan 26, 2019 at 08:11:51PM +0000, ALAIN AINA via Ssr2-review wrote:
> The SSAC document i referred to is actually SSAC comments on a report on Name collision mitigation .
> SAC066 : https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/sac-066-en.pdf
> The report: https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/name-collision-mitigation-study-06jun14-en.pdf
> General Information on name collision: https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/name-collision-2013-12-06-en
> Ssr2-review mailing list
> Ssr2-review at icann.org
More information about the Ssr2-review