[Ssr2-review] Proposed update to the workplan

[k claffy]

I think given past rate of progress it's an aggressive
timeline.  I don't see any obstacles, but I didn't see
any of the previous obstacles that slowed us down.

So I support targeting this timeline.
 
k

On Wed, Jul 17, 2019 at 10:22:19AM -0400, Russ Housley wrote:
 > Dear SSR2 Review Team:
 > 
 > On the plenary call a few minutes ago, I shared a proposed timeline for the SSR2 report.  It was:
 > 
 > - produce the recommendations and rationale for each recommendation by the ICANN meeting in Montreal in early November;
 > 
 > - share recommendations with the community during the ICANN meeting in Montreal;
 > 
 > - have a face-to-face meeting in January to address the feedback received during the ICANN meeting in Montreal; and
 > 
 > - release the draft report for public comment in late January or early February.
 > 
 > 
 > No one on the call saw any obstacles to meeting this timeline.  Does anyone that could not make the call see any?
 > 
 > Russ
 > _______________________________________________
 > Ssr2-review mailing list
 > Ssr2-review at icann.org
 > https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ssr2-review
 > 
 > _______________________________________________
 > By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
 >