[Ssr2-review] dropping recommendation 25
Russ Housley
housley at vigilsec.com
Wed Oct 16 19:33:20 UTC 2019
I agree that we should drop this one.
Russ
> On Oct 16, 2019, at 12:19 PM, k claffy <kc at caida.org> wrote:
>
>
> i came late to the call so i don't know what was said
> about recommendation 25, but eric and i proposed folding
> it into all the abuse measurement recommendations that come
> later (earlier? i can't tell from what's in this google doc).
>
> per denise's suggestion, we should probably air this on
> the list before we kill it.
>
> Recommendation 25: (Global SSR Measurement) -- Rec 24, 25, 30, 33, 34
>
> ICANN should propose or task the community to create a set of
> global (holistic) SSR-related measurements (including DNSSEC,
> availability, integrity, abuse, etc.) measurements that are both
> knowable and meaningful (i.e. what the community is likely to
> find informative and is also tractable to measure). This data
> may (and likely will) involve the cooperation of non-ICANN-org
> resources. ICANN should propose a set of data that is useful to
> assess the global health of the DNS globally (including deployment
> of DNSSEC, availability, abuse, abuse) and post this proposal
> for public comment. ICANN should then incorporate community
> feedback and produce a plan to create this public data/repository
> and an access model for these data. At the moment, it is difficult
> to assess DNSSEC deployment, including for members of the ICANN
> community. Better tracking of relevant indicators would serve
> strategic objectives 1, 2, and 3.
>
> when we do write measurement recommendations, we need to
> make them much more concrete ("measurement of abuse" won't
> cut it), and/or delegate them to some independent measurement
> expert to be contracted by icann, with all the resulting
> measurement methodology and data required to be public such
> that the analyses are reproducible.
>
> k
More information about the Ssr2-review
mailing list