[Ssr2-review] dropping recommendation 25

Russ Housley housley at vigilsec.com
Wed Oct 16 19:33:20 UTC 2019


I agree that we should drop this one.

Russ

> On Oct 16, 2019, at 12:19 PM, k claffy <kc at caida.org> wrote:
> 
> 
> i came late to the call so i don't know what was said
> about recommendation 25, but eric and i proposed folding
> it into all the abuse measurement recommendations that come
> later (earlier? i can't tell from what's in this google doc).
> 
> per denise's suggestion, we should probably air this on
> the list before we kill it.
> 
> 	Recommendation 25: (Global SSR Measurement) -- Rec 24, 25, 30, 33, 34
> 
> 	ICANN should propose or task the community to create a set of
> 	global (holistic) SSR-related measurements (including DNSSEC,
> 	availability, integrity, abuse, etc.) measurements that are both
> 	knowable and meaningful (i.e. what the community is likely to
> 	find informative and is also tractable to measure).  This data
> 	may (and likely will) involve the cooperation of non-ICANN-org
> 	resources. ICANN should propose a set of data that is useful to
> 	assess the global health of the DNS globally (including deployment
> 	of DNSSEC, availability, abuse, abuse) and post this proposal
> 	for public comment.  ICANN should then incorporate community
> 	feedback and produce a plan to create this public data/repository
> 	and an access model for these data. At the moment, it is difficult
> 	to assess DNSSEC deployment, including for members of the ICANN
> 	community. Better tracking of relevant indicators would serve
> 	strategic objectives 1, 2, and 3.
> 
> when we do write measurement recommendations, we need to
> make them much more concrete ("measurement of abuse" won't
> cut it), and/or delegate them to some independent measurement
> expert to be contracted by icann, with all the resulting 
> measurement methodology and data required to be public such 
> that the analyses are reproducible.
> 
> k




More information about the Ssr2-review mailing list