[Ssr2-review] Updates complete - draft ready for consideration for public comment

Matogoro Jabera jaberamatogoro at gmail.com
Wed Jan 22 06:35:01 UTC 2020


Dear Team,

I have gone through the clean document and confirm that I support the text
and will keep reading between lines and comment out during the meeting just
in case.

I am just following up if we have something prepared for public as an
outcome for recent meeting. This will help to inform communities we
represent to be aware of our progress. Sorry if I missed it in out.


Regards,
Matogoro

On Wed, 22 Jan 2020, 02:25 Heather Flanagan, <hlf at sphericalcowconsulting.com>
wrote:

> Hello all,
>
> First, some instructions for Jennifer:
>
> Please change the permissions on “SSR2  DRAFT report - recs and findings
> (first pass)“ (
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1PAG8kh4Jg_6BNMbkqebVpyqebw5mPjXr3ie-4rg210w/edit#)
> to read-only. No one should be making changes in that document any longer
> (but we will probably want it for reference, so don’t remove it).
>
> If possible, please change the permissions on “SSR2 Draft report -
> Proposed Public Comment.docx” to comment only. No one should be making
> changes to that document, either. (Given it’s an uploaded word doc, I don’t
> know if this is actually possible).
>
> Now, for everyone else:
> I have done some pretty major work on this document. In particular:
> 1. The summary table is now just a summary of one-line per recommendation.
> 2. Each individual recommendation is numbered in the body of the text
> (this was a request during the SME review, and think it helps the document
> overall).
> 3. The Abuse/Compliance section has been significantly restructured, with
> quite a bit of research material moved to Appendix E.
> 4. Many citations have been added (though we are still missing some).
>
> What’s missing:
> An executive summary. I can draft one, but not before our call. I am not
> sure if we need it, though, for the public comment period.
>
> The NEW marked up copy is here:
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/10U0rR1bPIQo-OSOqLpYGWDXmNGFX-tyW/edit#
> The CLEAN version is here:
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1iadFzdUkZTeayDHjz7oA_3YouGfdUBh6/edit
>
> I hope you find the document much more readable. For those of you keeping
> score, it’s now about 20 pages shorter than what we looked at last week
> (that’s mostly because of what I did to the summary table, plus about 4
> pages of material that I moved into the Appendix.
>
> I look forward to your feedback on tomorrow’s call.
>
> Heather
> _______________________________________________
> Ssr2-review mailing list
> Ssr2-review at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ssr2-review
>
> _______________________________________________
> By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your
> personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance
> with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and
> the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can
> visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or
> configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or
> disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ssr2-review/attachments/20200122/647d942f/attachment.html>


More information about the Ssr2-review mailing list