[Ssr2-review] Please raise any issues or concerns on the direction of Abuse Group of Subteams

[Russ Housley]

SSR2 RT:

The Abuse Group of Subteams provided a spreadsheet (attached again below).  It was observed that some people that provided public comment do not agree with some abuse-related recommendations. In some cases, the draft report was not clear, and the Abuse Group of Subteams are  proposing that the final report be more clear.  In other cases, the commenter does not agree with the recommendation, and the  the Abuse Group of Subteams are sticking to the previous SSR2 RT consensus around the recommendation.  

On the call today, there was agreement with the direction taken by the Abuse Group of Subteams.  If you have any issues or concerns, please raise them on the mail list now.

Russ



> On Jul 17, 2020, at 3:00 PM, Russ Housley <housley at vigilsec.com> wrote:
> 
> Please find the attachment for SSR2 RT review.  It contains the Abuse Subgroup’s work on the public comments on Recs 10 – 19. 
> 
> Abuse Subgroup is still working on merging and updating those Recs; however, this will allows everyone to see the direction that be being taken.
> 
> Russ
> 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Abuse Sub Team Proposed Responses - Comments.pdf
Type: application/pdf
Size: 187504 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ssr2-review/attachments/20200722/e10246c1/AbuseSubTeamProposedResponses-Comments-0001.pdf>