[Ssr2-review] Direction for Recommendation 1

Weissinger, Laurin laurin.weissinger at yale.edu
Mon May 25 16:14:54 UTC 2020


Dear all, 

As I said on call, I would want to look at it in detail before making a “final” call. Will do so later today. 

All the best
Laurin 

> On May 25, 2020, at 11:39, Naveed Bin Rais <naveedbinrais at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> I would like to go with CHOICE 3.
> 
> Naveed -
> 
> On Mon, May 25, 2020 at 7:36 PM Russ Housley <housley at vigilsec.com> wrote:
>> 
>> Two people on the call spoke for CHOICE 3.  Now, KC has spoken for CHOICE 2.  I would like to hear from others too.
>> 
>> Russ
>> 
>> 
>>> On May 24, 2020, at 2:59 PM, k claffy <kc at caida.org> wrote:
>>> 
>>> 
>>> I have always had, and made clear, a different opinion on this
>>> issue.  I believe we need to do Option 1, but we do not have
>>> the resources.  So we should probably have a recommendation
>>> that makes it clear that given the state of documentation, it
>>> was not possible for an independent review committee to do a
>>> reasonable job at the required task of assessing all previous
>>> implementations and their effectivness, beyond knowing that
>>> there were gaps, for the reasons we highlight at the top of
>>> Appendix D.  so we recommend this review task be outsourced to
>>> paid professionals, who should take appendix D and review the
>>> gaps that we discovered, and then make these recommendations SMART.
>>> 
>>> I suspect we will also need to recommend this outsourcing
>>> for our own recommendations, because I believe we cannot
>>> even make those SMART in limited volunteer review time.
>>> 
>>> I will note that ATRT3's original plan to perform this required
>>> reivew of ATRT2's implementation was just to accept ICANN's own
>>> self-assessment, due to the 12-month time window.  Several of
>>> us on the team objected to this approach, and prevailed, but
>>> we had the same trouble that SSR2 did with evaluating previous
>>> implementations.  I will also note that this is why ICANN now
>>> has implementation shepherds and the new Operating Standards,
>>> so they are quite aware of the problem.  Alas, CCT's
>>> implementation shepherds have not had much to shepherd..
>>> 
>>> That said, I am in favor of dropping as many recommendations
>>> as we can justify dropping from both SSR1 and 2.
>>> Sorry I haven't gotten a chance to talk to Eric yet about the
>>> ones we volunteered to cover. I hope this week.
>>> 
>>> k
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> CHOICE 1) Bring the table from Appendix D forward into Recommendation 1 and make each row SMART.  (A lot of work).
>>> 
>>> this issue; I think we should not have
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 10:23:30AM -0400, Russ Housley wrote:
>>> The people on the call today were supportive of CHOICE 3 (see below).  If you have a different opinion, please speak up now.
>>> 
>>> Russ
>>> 
>>>> On May 13, 2020, at 2:21 PM, Russ Housley <housley at vigilsec.com> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> SUBTEAM 1
>>>> 
>>>> The comments against recommendation 1 fall into two categories:
>>>> 
>>>> 1) Strong support for finishing SSR1 recommendation implementation from BC, IPC, M3AAWG, NCSG, RrSG, and RySG.
>>>> 
>>>> 2) Request for more detail on what is needed to "fully implement" each SSR1 recommendation from SSAC, ICANN Board, ICANN Org, and GAC.
>>>> 
>>>> In addition, the following comment assigned to Subteam 1 is not really about Recommendation 1.  I think we need to recategorize it.
>>>> 
>>>> (SSAC)(3.1.2) The SSAC has some concerns about the viability of
>>>> implementation of such a significant list of actions. Specifically,
>>>> the SSAC is concerned about the extent, cost, sequence, and timeframe
>>>> of the necessary actions required to implement all of these
>>>> recommendations. Are there other measures that the SSR2 RT may wish
>>>> to propose that would give the 135 proposed recommendations a
>>>> significant prospect of avoiding the same incomplete fate as the
>>>> 27 outstanding SSR1 recommendations by the time of the next SSR review?
>>>> 
>>>> This is really encouraging us to have fewer recommendations.  The GAG comments also encourage fewer recommendations.
>>>> 
>>>> I think the whole review team needs to weigh in on the choices for going forward.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> CHOICE 1) Bring the table from Appendix D forward into Recommendation 1 and make each row SMART.  (A lot of work).
>>>> CHOICE 2) Drop Recommendation 1 and strengthen Suggestion 2 to say that incomplete implementation will be caught earlier in the process by the ICANN community, but also encourage the completion of the SSR1 recommendation implementation.
>>>> 
>>>> CHOICE 3) Keep Recommendation 1 as is, and strengthen Suggestion 2.
>>>> 
>>>> We will discuss the way forward on the next SSR2 RT Plenary call.
>>>> 
>>>> Russ
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>> On May 11, 2020, at 14:02, Russ Housley <housley at vigilsec.com> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> We are not having a plenary call this week so that subteams can continue their work.
>>>>> 
>>>>> I ask that the Rapporteur for each subteam to send a short status to the whole team by close of business on Wednesday.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Russ
>>>>> 
>>>>> - - - - - - - -
>>>>> 
>>>>> Subteam No. / Rapporteur
>>>>> 
>>>>> 1   Russ
>>>>> 2   Boban
>>>>> 3   Kerry-Ann
>>>>> 4   Noorul
>>>>> 5   Laurin
>>>>> 6   Norm
>>>>> 7   Boban
>>>>> 8   Boban
>>>>> 9   Boban
>>>>> 10  Denise
>>>>> 11  Denise
>>>>> 12  Denise
>>>>> 13  Denise
>>>>> 14  Denise
>>>>> 15  Laurin
>>>>> 16  Laurin
>>>>> 17  Laurin
>>>>> 18  Laurin
>>>>> 19  kc
>>>>> 20  Eric
>>>>> 21  Eric
>>>>> 22  kc
>>>>> 23  Zarko
>>>>> 24  kc
>>>>> 25  kc
>>>>> 26  Zarko
>>>>> 27  Alain
>>>>> 28  Naveed
>>>>> 29  Kerry-Ann
>>>>> 30  Eric
>>>>> 31  Zarko
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Ssr2-review mailing list
>>> Ssr2-review at icann.org
>>> https://nam05.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fmm.icann.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fssr2-review&data=02%7C01%7Claurin.weissinger%40yale.edu%7C553614a8fd9b4588b25408d800c1dfbf%7Cdd8cbebb21394df8b4114e3e87abeb5c%7C0%7C0%7C637260179976842045&sdata=nAW5vY6yob29OKJzsVN5SpFIxfjqgZ8MIHmhIu6JnHk%3D&reserved=0
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://nam05.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.icann.org%2Fprivacy%2Fpolicy&data=02%7C01%7Claurin.weissinger%40yale.edu%7C553614a8fd9b4588b25408d800c1dfbf%7Cdd8cbebb21394df8b4114e3e87abeb5c%7C0%7C0%7C637260179976842045&sdata=mPZoZ56P4HBmITugGJhteOkAX3IOGocO38fZbZpoT0Y%3D&reserved=0) and the website Terms of Service (https://nam05.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.icann.org%2Fprivacy%2Ftos&data=02%7C01%7Claurin.weissinger%40yale.edu%7C553614a8fd9b4588b25408d800c1dfbf%7Cdd8cbebb21394df8b4114e3e87abeb5c%7C0%7C0%7C637260179976842045&sdata=4P5wp%2FSUZIvbEniAMZcvRPpslNS72KRrB5jvcGJBwQI%3D&reserved=0). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
>>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Ssr2-review mailing list
>> Ssr2-review at icann.org
>> https://nam05.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fmm.icann.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fssr2-review&data=02%7C01%7Claurin.weissinger%40yale.edu%7C553614a8fd9b4588b25408d800c1dfbf%7Cdd8cbebb21394df8b4114e3e87abeb5c%7C0%7C0%7C637260179976842045&sdata=nAW5vY6yob29OKJzsVN5SpFIxfjqgZ8MIHmhIu6JnHk%3D&reserved=0
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://nam05.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.icann.org%2Fprivacy%2Fpolicy&data=02%7C01%7Claurin.weissinger%40yale.edu%7C553614a8fd9b4588b25408d800c1dfbf%7Cdd8cbebb21394df8b4114e3e87abeb5c%7C0%7C0%7C637260179976842045&sdata=mPZoZ56P4HBmITugGJhteOkAX3IOGocO38fZbZpoT0Y%3D&reserved=0) and the website Terms of Service (https://nam05.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.icann.org%2Fprivacy%2Ftos&data=02%7C01%7Claurin.weissinger%40yale.edu%7C553614a8fd9b4588b25408d800c1dfbf%7Cdd8cbebb21394df8b4114e3e87abeb5c%7C0%7C0%7C637260179976842045&sdata=4P5wp%2FSUZIvbEniAMZcvRPpslNS72KRrB5jvcGJBwQI%3D&reserved=0). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
> _______________________________________________
> Ssr2-review mailing list
> Ssr2-review at icann.org
> https://nam05.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fmm.icann.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fssr2-review&data=02%7C01%7Claurin.weissinger%40yale.edu%7C553614a8fd9b4588b25408d800c1dfbf%7Cdd8cbebb21394df8b4114e3e87abeb5c%7C0%7C0%7C637260179976842045&sdata=nAW5vY6yob29OKJzsVN5SpFIxfjqgZ8MIHmhIu6JnHk%3D&reserved=0
> 
> _______________________________________________
> By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://nam05.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.icann.org%2Fprivacy%2Fpolicy&data=02%7C01%7Claurin.weissinger%40yale.edu%7C553614a8fd9b4588b25408d800c1dfbf%7Cdd8cbebb21394df8b4114e3e87abeb5c%7C0%7C0%7C637260179976842045&sdata=mPZoZ56P4HBmITugGJhteOkAX3IOGocO38fZbZpoT0Y%3D&reserved=0) and the website Terms of Service (https://nam05.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.icann.org%2Fprivacy%2Ftos&data=02%7C01%7Claurin.weissinger%40yale.edu%7C553614a8fd9b4588b25408d800c1dfbf%7Cdd8cbebb21394df8b4114e3e87abeb5c%7C0%7C0%7C637260179976852035&sdata=7%2BCLKzZvyD5ifUYjW7N7b8NGyZIzmn0HAQ8fTG6u2mE%3D&reserved=0). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.



More information about the Ssr2-review mailing list