[Ssr2-review] Abuse Text

[k claffy]

We have not achieved consensus on the SLA text in this section.
I put my comments into the google doc last nite.

My biggest problem surrounds the assumption that we can
trust private, commercial data as evidence that should 
cause ICANN to assume a registrar/registry is "guilty until
proven innocent" and take punitive action if registrars 
can't prove their own innocence.  

We have something buried 3 pages later about recommending that

	ICANN Org should ensure it structures its agreements with 
	any data feeds providers to allow for further sharing of the
	data with independent researchers for reproducibility and
	peer-reviewed scientific research, at no additional cost. All
	data-sharing contract terms should be published on 
	the ICANN web site. 

This latter recommendation will have to be : (1) strengthened
significantly, such that independent third parties can verify
or refute the findings of the commercial providers, at icann's
expense; and (2) implemented prerequsite to any use of this
data as evidence in a 'registrar takedown', and (3) result in
something so different from the current DAAR model as to be
confusing to even call it DAAR.

The current text recommends that ICANN toss out any
concept of due process.    It's a non-starter, afaict.
Even regulators wouldn't do that.  Indeed, regulators
would put a stop to it.

k

On Mon, Nov 16, 2020 at 01:00:05PM -0500, Russ Housley wrote:
  We need to determine whether we have achieved consensus on the Abuse Subteam text on Thursday.  Please review the text in the Google Doc prior to the call.  Please use comments or edits in suggest mode!
  
  	 https://docs.google.com/document/d/1PdjkR6i_FdXuFTomxptVpLVVtORRTgrrnVQ-vSpmGGQ/edit#bookmark=id.gjdgxs
  
  Thanks,
    Russ
  
  
  On Nov 15, 2020, at 5:15 PM, Weissinger, Laurin <laurin.weissinger at yale.edu> wrote:
  > Dear all, 
  > 
  > As discussed on call, Denise took the pen and added some text. Currently, those changes are in markup so it is apparent. Please have a look and raise issues on list or in the doc by Tuesday night if at all possible. This is to give the sub team time to make changes and to share those in time. As always, please use suggest mode and/or comments on g-docs.
  > 
  > As you know, we would like to discuss all outstanding items on Thursday and get an idea of team consensus as well. 
  > 
  > Document here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1PdjkR6i_FdXuFTomxptVpLVVtORRTgrrnVQ-vSpmGGQ/edit#bookmark=id.gjdgxs
  > 
  > All the best
  > Laurin 
  
  _______________________________________________
  Ssr2-review mailing list
  Ssr2-review at icann.org
  https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ssr2-review
  
  _______________________________________________
  By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.