[Ssr2-review] Feedback on Recommendation 28

[Naveed Bin Rais]

I am just suggesting that based on what information I could gather and also
on the feedback received last week, I plan to edit the text of existing
recommendation and then it could be discussed in the plenary session.

Naveed -

On Mon, Oct 5, 2020 at 10:04 AM k claffy <kc at caida.org> wrote:

>
>
> Naveed,
> are you saying you have enough info to re-write
> the recommendation?
>
> yes iirc i pointed you at ncap study 1 public comments:
>
> https://mm.icann.org/a/comments-ncap-1-proposed-final-report-08may20/2020q2/thread.html
> k
>
>
> On Mon, Oct 05, 2020 at 09:32:27AM +0400, Naveed Bin Rais wrote:
>   Hi KC,
>
>   I don't know who wrote the recommendation. The original recommendation
> has
>   some clarity problems but I had put my notes in the excel sheet to
> resolve
>   those problems and if I remember, I have taken your input at that point
>   regarding the public comments received on the draft as well as on my
>   response.
>
>   As for the merit of the recommendation itself even after we address the
>   public comments, I think it can be part of the report. But others can
>   provide their input. The thursday call might be a good time to talk on
> the
>   merit after I draft the text.
>
>   Cheers,
>   Naveed -
>
>   On Mon, Oct 5, 2020 at 2:15 AM k claffy <kc at caida.org> wrote:
>
>   >
>   >
>   >
>   > Naveed,  I do not even understand the Recommendation.
>   >
>   > What specifically does SSR2 want done that has not been done in
>   > previous reports?  What "solution" does SSR2 want besides the
>   > existing one (controlled interruption)?
>   >
>   > Who wrote this recommendation, and is willing to speak to it now?
>   >
>   > I'm sure this recommendation is one of the reasons I thought
>   > this report was not yet ready for public comment..
>   >
>   > k
>   >
>   >
>   >
>   > On Wed, Sep 30, 2020 at 04:25:18PM +0400, Naveed Bin Rais wrote:
>   >   Dear All,
>   >
>   >   With reference to public comments on recommendation 28 of the draft
>   > report,
>   >   I need the team's input to proceed further. There are many aspects of
>   > this
>   >   recommendation that I am not familiar with.
>   >
>   >   Attached you would find the public comments related to the
> recommendation
>   >   and my responses to each of these comments. Please have a look at the
>   >   attached file and my responses to see if that makes sense. Also, I
> need
>   >   your advice related to Row Number 5, 8 and 9 of the attached file.
>   >
>   >   Row 5 is a comment from RySG in which they are inquiring whether
>   >   our recommendation is only related to TLD or it also applies to the
>   >   second level.
>   >
>   >   Row 8: Our recommendation seems to suggest that there should be
>   >   an independent study related to name collision in addition to NCAP
>   >   study and then both these studies should be vetted by third parties.
>   >   This seems to be a two-step process. Is this what we meant by
>   >   the recommendation?
>   >
>   >   Row 9: I need your input about how we can make the reporting
>   >   criteria (mechanism) SMART.
>   >
>   >   Thanks.
>   >
>   >   Cheers,
>   >   Naveed -
>   >
>   >
>   >   _______________________________________________
>   >   Ssr2-review mailing list
>   >   Ssr2-review at icann.org
>   >   https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ssr2-review
>   >
>   >   _______________________________________________
>   >   By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of
> your
>   > personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list
> accordance
>   > with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy)
> and
>   > the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You
> can
>   > visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or
>   > configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery
> or
>   > disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
>   >
>   >
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ssr2-review/attachments/20201005/af239667/attachment.html>