[Ssr2-review] Rec 21

[k claffy]

Eric,

can you link to the responses to the public comments,
i.e., how they were handled, in 
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1DQpPA0aLDsW5IHLKgQqHtW-5860CKGCuTYIOeMPEaaw/edit#gid=925648260
i dont' see any attempt to address their comments
in the text.


also, this text in the findings looks too dated.
the text refers/links to an open call for public comments
Proposal for Future Root Zone KSK Rollovers, 1 November 2019, 
https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/proposal-future-rz-ksk-rollovers-01nov19-en.pdf
(a document that has no date on the document itself,
a terrible habit i wish ICANN would fix)

anyway this public comment closed over 6 months ago
	https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ksk-rollover/attachments/20200807/c955c65f/StaffReportofPublicCommentProceeding-ProposalforFutureRootZoneKSKRollovers-0001.pdf
we should link to the higher level ICANN page 
that links to the proposal and to this public comment summary,
but none of the links on that URL above work
(despite the section "Important Information Links", 
with three things that really convince you to
click on them several times because they must be links!)

maybe heather can work w ICANN to fix this 

and then we can link to the appropriate thing.

anyway, i note that the summary of public comments, including
those from from RSSAC and SSAC, include many other issues
besides this need for formal procedure (although NCSG does
mention formal modeling).  i don't understand why SSR2 is
focusing so much on this formal modeling task that "some SSAC
reviewers" consider not implementable.  we should consider
whether what we're recommending is more important (or already
covered) by the public comment process.

k


On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 02:31:49PM -0400, Russ Housley wrote:
  Eric:
  
  I like the information that was added, but I do not like where it was added.  You gave a bunch or rationale for doing it, but it is in the recommendation, and it should, I think, be in the finding.
  
  Russ
  
  
  
  > On Sep 14, 2020, at 12:48 PM, Eric Osterweil <lists at osterweil.net> wrote:
  > 
  > Hi all,
  > 
  > Please take a look at updated text on recommendation 21.2 in this document:
  > 	https://docs.google.com/document/d/1FaGlYsLVSob_CflYkKBag4L27vMUNA0C0kVNtAI0KEI/edit?pli=1#
  > 
  > Thank you,
  > 
  > Eric
  
  _______________________________________________
  Ssr2-review mailing list
  Ssr2-review at icann.org
  https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ssr2-review
  
  _______________________________________________
  By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.