[Ssr2-review] Rec 21

[Eric Osterweil]

Hi kc,

I agree we should have working links, but I am worried that trying to update findings as the RT rolls along might be moving the goalposts.  How about a quick call at some point soon?

Eric

> On Sep 14, 2020, at 6:14 PM, k claffy <kc at caida.org> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Eric,
> 
> can you link to the responses to the public comments,
> i.e., how they were handled, in 
> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1DQpPA0aLDsW5IHLKgQqHtW-5860CKGCuTYIOeMPEaaw/edit#gid=925648260
> i dont' see any attempt to address their comments
> in the text.
> 
> 
> also, this text in the findings looks too dated.
> the text refers/links to an open call for public comments
> Proposal for Future Root Zone KSK Rollovers, 1 November 2019, 
> https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/proposal-future-rz-ksk-rollovers-01nov19-en.pdf
> (a document that has no date on the document itself,
> a terrible habit i wish ICANN would fix)
> 
> anyway this public comment closed over 6 months ago
> 	https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ksk-rollover/attachments/20200807/c955c65f/StaffReportofPublicCommentProceeding-ProposalforFutureRootZoneKSKRollovers-0001.pdf
> we should link to the higher level ICANN page 
> that links to the proposal and to this public comment summary,
> but none of the links on that URL above work
> (despite the section "Important Information Links", 
> with three things that really convince you to
> click on them several times because they must be links!)
> 
> maybe heather can work w ICANN to fix this 
> 
> and then we can link to the appropriate thing.
> 
> anyway, i note that the summary of public comments, including
> those from from RSSAC and SSAC, include many other issues
> besides this need for formal procedure (although NCSG does
> mention formal modeling).  i don't understand why SSR2 is
> focusing so much on this formal modeling task that "some SSAC
> reviewers" consider not implementable.  we should consider
> whether what we're recommending is more important (or already
> covered) by the public comment process.
> 
> k
> 
> 
> On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 02:31:49PM -0400, Russ Housley wrote:
>  Eric:
> 
>  I like the information that was added, but I do not like where it was added.  You gave a bunch or rationale for doing it, but it is in the recommendation, and it should, I think, be in the finding.
> 
>  Russ
> 
> 
> 
>> On Sep 14, 2020, at 12:48 PM, Eric Osterweil <lists at osterweil.net> wrote:
>> 
>> Hi all,
>> 
>> Please take a look at updated text on recommendation 21.2 in this document:
>> 	https://docs.google.com/document/d/1FaGlYsLVSob_CflYkKBag4L27vMUNA0C0kVNtAI0KEI/edit?pli=1#
>> 
>> Thank you,
>> 
>> Eric
> 
>  _______________________________________________
>  Ssr2-review mailing list
>  Ssr2-review at icann.org
>  https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ssr2-review
> 
>  _______________________________________________
>  By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
>