[Ssr2-review] [EXT] Do we have full consensus?

[Barrett, Kerry-Ann]

Just a general feedback that I really like the restructuring and wanted to acknowledge the team members and Heather who really worked on making this readable and findings transparent and solid.

I left a few minor comments and I know Heather may be looking at them as I write this ☺

[OAS.org]<http://www.oas.org/>



Sincerely
Kerry-Ann Barrett
Cybersecurity Program Officer
Secretariat of the Inter-American Committee against Terrorism (CICTE)
Secretariat for Multidimensional Security (SMS)
Organization of American States
1889 F Street NW Washington D.C. 20006
[http://www.oas.org/en/sms/signature_images/phone.png]  (202) 370 4675 - [http://www.oas.org/en/sms/signature_images/fax.png]  (202) 458 3857
www.oas.org/cyber<http://www.oas.org/cyber>
@KerryOAS<https://twitter.com/KerryOAS>| @OEA_Cyber<https://twitter.com/OEA_Cyber>

Register to our distribution list here!<http://oas.us11.list-manage.com/subscribe?u=353ff0663258ae5a775d460db&id=10adfc04db>




From: Ssr2-review [mailto:ssr2-review-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Russ Housley
Sent: Tuesday, January 12, 2021 4:20 PM
To: ICANN SSR2 <ssr2-review at icann.org>
Subject: [EXT] [Ssr2-review] Do we have full consensus?

CAUTION: EXTERNAL SENDER


I would like to add a sentence to the final report: All of these recommendations have full consensus for the SSR2 Review Team.  If you do not agree with that, please send a note to the mail list prior to the call on Thursday.

Thanks,
 Russ



On Jan 12, 2021, at 4:16 PM, Jennifer Bryce <jennifer.bryce at icann.org<mailto:jennifer.bryce at icann.org>> wrote:

Dear SSR2 RT members,

Below is the agenda for the next SSR2 plenary call, scheduled for Thursday 14 January @ 15:00 - 17:00 UTC. Please note this is the last planned meeting.

  1.  Welcome, roll call, SOI updates
  2.  Determine consensus level on Final Report <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1rMdW1YCebe6Yj678OUrlc3TsACZsqmwuqN3yaIjTFoc/edit>

     *   Note addition to the findings text on p41

  1.  Review and determine consensus level on public comment response spreadsheet<https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1DQpPA0aLDsW5IHLKgQqHtW-5860CKGCuTYIOeMPEaaw/edit#gid=595911168>. Note the following (per Russ’s 8 January email<https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ssr2-review/2021-January/002417.html>):

     *   “ROW 40: The response includes the phrase: "The review team did reach out".  I would like confirmation that the subteam took this action.  If that did not happen, we need to correct the response text.”
     *   “ROWS 235 and 326: We realized that the Abuse Subteam had agreed to say something about brand TLDs, but it did not make it into the document.  Laurin and Heather have proposed some text for the report.  The text appear in suggest mode on pages 40 and 41 of the report.  The public comment response only makes sense if these small additions are added to the report.  Please make sure you review these proposed changes.  If these late changes are not acceptable to the whole RT, then we need to acknowledge that this comment fell through the cracks.”

  1.  Determine implementation shepherds
  2.  Next steps – timeline to submit the report to the Board, and possible community webinar
  3.  AOB
  4.  Confirm action items & decisions reached
Best,
Jennifer

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ssr2-review/attachments/20210113/e166ff78/attachment.html>