<html xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40"><head><meta http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=us-ascii"><meta name=Generator content="Microsoft Word 12 (filtered medium)"><style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:"CG Times";
panose-1:2 2 6 3 5 4 5 2 3 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:purple;
text-decoration:underline;}
span.EmailStyle17
{mso-style-type:personal-compose;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:windowtext;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;}
@page WordSection1
{size:8.5in 11.0in;
margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]--></head><body lang=EN-US link=blue vlink=purple><div class=WordSection1><p class=MsoNormal>Dear IAG:<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>N3 Comment:<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>The issue of abandonment (non-use) of a trademark that is the subject of a trademark registration recorded in the Trademark Clearinghouse(TMCH) is going to be a common issue. Section 7.2 of the Trademark Clearinghouse (11 Jan 2012) requires that "[r]egistries must recognize and honor all word marks: (i) nationally or regionally registered and for which proof of use – which can be a declaration and a single specimen of current use – was submitted to, and validated by, the Trademark Clearinghouse." However, the current list of four challenges in Section 6.2.4 does not clearly allow a challenge that the use determination was improperly made or that a mark recorded in the TMCH was no longer eligible because it was not in use at the time the domain name was registered. Unless, there is another manner to remove these non-used, abandoned marks from the TMCH, I would suggest adding another ground for an SDRP: "(v) At the time the challenged domain name was registered, the registrant's mark contained in the trademark registration entered in the Trademark Clearinghouse used to support the sunrise registration of the challenged domain name was not in current use." In order to avoid frivolous challenges of non-use, I would echo support for a loser pays model suggested by Keith Barritt. <o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>N4 Comment:<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Along the same lines, with respect to N4, in (or as an alternative to adding a SDRP challenge) I would recommend the ability for third-parties to challenge and remove non-used trademarks from the data set for Sunrise Eligible trademarks. <o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Furthermore, as discussed on the last conference call, after entry into the TMCH, I would recommend a periodic renewal (between 1 and 3 years) of the trademark data that would be easy and quick for registrants. See Trademark Clearinghouse Section 3.9. I would suggest an process similar to the maintenance of domain name registrations that would have the following qualities. First, electronic submission such as an email reminders providing a link and/ or a website registrant portal should be used whereby the trademark owner reaffirms that the data initially provided is accurate and pays its renewal fee. Second, the owner of TMCH records should be able to renew those records <u>within</u> a set period of time so that they have the option of renewing early to synch all of their records to one periodic renewal date. Third, I would suggest that trademark owners could opt in for renewal fees to be automatic charges to a credit card account. This would ensure that records are not accidentally lost for non-payment of renewal fees. In order to make sure, however, that information is reaffirmed correctly and timely, late charges and penalties could be assessed via this method. See Trademark Clearinghouse Section 3.8.<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>John<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><div><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:7.5pt;color:#999999'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><b><span style='font-size:10.5pt;color:#7F7F7F'>John C. McElwaine</span></b><b><span style='font-size:4.0pt;color:#7F7F7F'><o:p></o:p></span></b></p><p class=MsoNormal><b><span style='font-size:15.0pt;font-family:"CG Times","serif";color:#4F81BD'>Nelson Mullins <o:p></o:p></span></b></p><p class=MsoNormal><b><span style='font-size:6.0pt;color:#4F81BD'>Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP</span></b><b><span style='font-size:6.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman","serif";color:#4F81BD'><o:p></o:p></span></b></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:9.0pt;color:gray'>Charleston Office</span><span style='color:#999999'><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:9.0pt;color:gray'>151 Meeting Street, Ste. 600 </span><span style='font-size:9.0pt;color:blue'>¦</span><span style='font-size:9.0pt;color:gray'> Charleston, SC 29401 </span><span style='font-size:9.0pt;color:blue'>¦</span><span style='color:#999999'><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:9.0pt;color:gray'>d: +1 843.720.4302 </span><span style='font-size:9.0pt;color:blue'>¦</span><span style='font-size:9.0pt;color:gray'> f: +1 843.534.4269 </span><span style='font-size:9.0pt;color:blue'>¦</span><span style='font-size:9.0pt;color:gray'> m: +1 843.209.8988</span><span style='font-size:9.0pt;color:blue'>¦</span><span style='font-size:9.0pt;color:gray'><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:7.5pt;color:#999999'>________________________________________________________________<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:7.5pt;color:#548DD4'><a href="http://www.twitter.com/scyberwatch"><span style='color:#548DD4'>Follow Cyberwatch on Twitter</span></a><o:p></o:p></span></p></div><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p></div>
<P><pre wrap>==============================================================================
Confidentiality Notice
This message is intended exclusively for the individual or
entity to which it is addressed. This communication may
contain information that is proprietary, privileged,
confidential or otherwise legally exempt from disclosure.
If you are not the named addressee, you are not authorized
to read, print, retain, copy or disseminate this message
or any part of it. If you have received this message in
error, please notify the sender immediately either by
phone (800-237-2000) or reply to this e-mail and delete
all copies of this message.
To ensure compliance with the requirements imposed by the
IRS, we inform you that any U.S. federal tax advice
contained in this communication (including the
attachments) is not intended or written to be used, for
the purpose of (a) avoiding penalties under the Internal
Revenue Code or (b) promoting, marketing or recommending
to another party any transaction or tax-related matter[s].
To provide you with a communication that could be used to
avoid penalties under the Internal Revenue Code will
necessarily entail additional investigations, analysis and
conclusions on our part.
==============================================================================
</pre></P></body></html>