[technology taskforce] [Atlas-ii-participants] Well done => not so well apparently

Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond ocl at gih.com
Wed Jul 2 11:22:15 UTC 2014

On 01/07/2014 15:58, Garth Bruen wrote:
> First, remote participation is not anywhere near the level it should
> be. Our members even in the U.S complain about the quality and
> accessibility. Then there is the whole issue of disabled access which
> is a disgrace. If remote participation was truly effective, few people
> would even have to attend the meetings in person. There were many
> proposals and discussions around improving remote participation, some
> extracted from the Netmundial meeting. I have been discussing a better
> type of overall participation with some of my colleagues in At-Large
> and hope to have a draft for leadership to review soon. 

What could be done at improving remote participation?
Our meetings now have full video and are much more interactive than they
used to be. What else should we do to improve the experience?
Kind regards,

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mm.icann.org/mailman/private/ttf/attachments/20140702/05238456/attachment.html>

More information about the ttf mailing list