[technology taskforce] Fwd: AW: [EURO-Discuss] Zoom Structural Vulnerability Discovered
Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond
ocl at gih.com
Wed Jul 10 18:22:35 UTC 2019
Hello all,
discussions are heating up on the topic of Zoom both in NCSG mailing
list, and on the EURALO discuss mailing list. Isn't this issue more
urgent than waiting for a future TTF call, the date of which is, at
present, not even set?
At least a call from the TTF to ICANN Tech Team to write a Blog of what
their risk assessment is, with regards to this conferencing technology?
In the meantime, conversations about this are springing up on several
other mailing lists...
Kindest regards,
Olivier
-------- Forwarded Message --------
Subject: AW: [EURO-Discuss] Zoom Structural Vulnerability Discovered
Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2019 14:12:57 +0000
From: Mühlberg, Annette <annette.muehlberg at verdi.de>
To: Jean-Jacques Subrenat <jjs at dyalog.net>,
ncsg-discuss at listserv.syr.edu <ncsg-discuss at listserv.syr.edu>, Paul
Rosenzweig <paul.rosenzweig at redbranchconsulting.com>, EURALO LIST
<euro-discuss at atlarge-lists.icann.org>, Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond
<ocl at gih.com>, maureen.hilyard at gmail.com <maureen.hilyard at gmail.com>
Dear All,
+1 for JJS: set up a specifications sheet for a desirable conferencing
tool, based on needs expressed by the multi-stakeholder community, and
publish that as a tender. Offers received could then be reviewed not
only by Staff, but in consultation with ACs and SOs.
Such needs include data privacy, technical stability and preferably open
standards.
Best regards
Annette
***
*Annette Mühlberg *
*Von:*EURO-Discuss <euro-discuss-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org> *Im
Auftrag von *Jean-Jacques Subrenat
*Gesendet:* Mittwoch, 10. Juli 2019 15:22
*An:* ncsg-discuss at listserv.syr.edu; Paul Rosenzweig
<paul.rosenzweig at redbranchconsulting.com>; EURALO LIST
<euro-discuss at atlarge-lists.icann.org>; Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond
<ocl at gih.com>; maureen.hilyard at gmail.com
*Betreff:* Re: [EURO-Discuss] Zoom Structural Vulnerability Discovered
First, a remark: for Adobe, Zoom or other tool providers, ICANN may not
be the single largest client, but it is certainly a significant one
owing to its nature (quasi-regulatory, multi-stakeholder, some parts
geared to non-commercial users).
Then, a recommendation to Chairs of ACs and SOs: ICANN Board and CEO
could be requested to set up a specifications sheet for a desirable
conferencing tool, based on needs expressed by the multi-stakeholder
community, and publish that as a tender. Offers received could then be
reviewed not only by Staff, but in consultation with ACs and SOs.
This would get us closer to what we, collectively, consider as the
appropriate tool for the numerous conference calls held throughout ICANN.
Jean-Jacques Subrenat.
Le 10 juillet 2019 à 14:46:20, Paul Rosenzweig
(paul.rosenzweig at redbranchconsulting.com
<mailto:paul.rosenzweig at redbranchconsulting.com>) a écrit:
This is assuredly right. The change from Adobe to Zoom may, or may
not, have been right for ICANN and for this group for any number of
reasons ranging from cost, to security, to scalability and utility.
But let’s not romanticize Adobe. They are not a terribly secure
platform generically. As James said, the Zoom response is poor –
but we can’t hang that around the neck of ICANN org.
P
Paul Rosenzweig
paul.rosenzweig at redbranchconsulting.com
<mailto:paul.rosenzweig at redbranchconsulting.com>
O: +1 (202) 547-0660
M: +1 (202) 329-9650
VOIP: +1 (202) 738-1739
www.redbranchconsulting.com
<https://smex-ctp.trendmicro.com:443/wis/clicktime/v1/query?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.redbranchconsulting.com&umid=c229a495-2a7d-4cae-9bf7-9903622d5c2e&auth=4e1e2e6e47336e7e6bbb545ae21187b18d0da0ad-0f83b2fc00a6214e49105ca52e5410a6110e8337>
My PGP Key:
https://keys.mailvelope.com/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x9A830097CA066684
*From:*NCSG-Discuss <NCSG-DISCUSS at LISTSERV.SYR.EDU
<mailto:NCSG-DISCUSS at LISTSERV.SYR.EDU>> *On Behalf Of *James Gannon
*Sent:* Wednesday, July 10, 2019 12:52 AM
*To:* NCSG-DISCUSS at LISTSERV.SYR.EDU
<mailto:NCSG-DISCUSS at LISTSERV.SYR.EDU>
*Subject:* Re: Zoom Structural Vulnerability Discovered
Just want to call out that Adobe has likely the worst reputation in
the entire tech industry when it comes to security, I really would
not hold them out as either prompt or without serious issues (I
believe they still hold the record for number of CVSS 9+ vulns).
Zooms response is poor I agree, but on a data driven comparison it
is a far more secure platform.
*From: *NCSG-Discuss <NCSG-DISCUSS at LISTSERV.SYR.EDU
<mailto:NCSG-DISCUSS at LISTSERV.SYR.EDU>> on behalf of Ayden Férdeline
<icann at FERDELINE.COM <mailto:icann at FERDELINE.COM>>
*Reply-To: *Ayden Férdeline <icann at FERDELINE.COM
<mailto:icann at FERDELINE.COM>>
*Date: *Tuesday, 9 July 2019 at 14:13
*To: *"NCSG-DISCUSS at LISTSERV.SYR.EDU
<mailto:NCSG-DISCUSS at LISTSERV.SYR.EDU>"
<NCSG-DISCUSS at LISTSERV.SYR.EDU <mailto:NCSG-DISCUSS at LISTSERV.SYR.EDU>>
*Subject: *Re: Zoom Structural Vulnerability Discovered
That is true, but note that this security researcher notified Zoom
of the exploit and they were in no rush to repair it. Look at the
timeline in the Medium post. They only sought to fix it after the
vulnerability drew media attention.
Adobe Connect was not perfect but it met our needs and the
occasional security issues that arose were promptly fixed by Adobe
and never as serious as this one!
Best wishes, Ayden
On Tue, Jul 9, 2019 at 18:07, Adeel Sadiq <11beeasadiq at seecs.edu.pk
<mailto:11beeasadiq at seecs.edu.pk>> wrote:
Speaking from a technical perspective, no software is perfect or
bug-free. Its only a matter of time a loophole is found and
exploited and eventually patched up. If you think Adobe Connect
or ezTalks were/are free of these architectural issues, think
again! That's the way we technical community do things.
Regards
Adeel
Pakistan
On Wed, Jul 10, 2019 at 1:37 AM Ayden Férdeline
<icann at ferdeline.com <mailto:icann at ferdeline.com>> wrote:
Unfortunately, uninstalling the application does not rectify
the situation, due to poor architecture (acknowledged by
Zoom on their blog today). They are working on a fix, now
that public scrutiny demands one. So disappointing
that ICANN has put us in this terrible situation.
Ayden
On Tue, Jul 9, 2019 at 16:15, Vaibhav Aggarwal, Catalyst &
Group CEO <va at BLADEBRAINS.COM <mailto:va at BLADEBRAINS.COM>>
wrote:
Thanks for this. Till the next Update, I have removed
the Zoom For Mac Client with immediate effect.
Regards,
Vaibhav Aggarwal
New Delhi
VaibhavAggarwal.com <http://VaibhavAggarwal.com>
On Jul 10, 2019, at 12:30 AM, Michael Karanicolas
<mkaranicolas at GMAIL.COM
<mailto:mkaranicolas at GMAIL.COM>> wrote:
Hey - remember when ICANN switched everyone from
Adobe over to Zoom as a way of enhancing information
security and data privacy?
"A vulnerability in the Mac Zoom Client allows any
malicious website to enable your camera without your
permission... This vulnerability allows any website
to forcibly join a user to a Zoom call, with their
video camera activated, without the user's
permission. On top of this, this vulnerability would
have allowed any webpage to DOS (Denial of Service)
a Mac by repeatedly joining a user to an invalid
call. Additionally, if you’ve ever installed the
Zoom client and then uninstalled it, you still have
a localhost web server on your machine that will
happily re-install the Zoom client for you, without
requiring any user interaction on your behalf
besides visiting a webpage. This re-install
‘feature’ continues to work to this day."
Read more
here: https://medium.com/@jonathan.leitschuh/zoom-zero-day-4-million-webcams-maybe-an-rce-just-get-them-to-visit-your-website-ac75c83f4ef5
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ttf/attachments/20190710/48bb86bc/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the ttf
mailing list