Tue May 5 02:14:34 UTC 1987
Date: Mon, 4 May 87 11:04:30 EDT
Message-ID: <8705041525.AA23780 at hpfcla>
That is why we NEED the tm_tzadj member added to the tm structure.
I'm not sure I follow how this follows. I agree that a tm_zone
(ie: what zone this time was converted from) is needed, but I
don't see the need for a separate time zone adjustment field.
That is, I can't see anything rational for it to be an adjustment from.
I don't believe the concept of a "standard zone" makes any sense, in
general there simply is no such thing.
The only number of consequence is the offset from gmt of this particular
More information about the tz