problem with tzcode96l

Todd C. Miller Todd.Miller at
Tue Oct 29 20:56:47 UTC 1996

In message <199610291921.LAA16622 at>
	so spake Paul Eggert (eggert):

> If mktime returns -1 then that is a bug, but I can't reproduce the bug
> when building tzcode96l on Solaris 2.5.1.  I used
> to build tzcode96l.  mktime had the behavior described above
> (it returned 667529999 for the positive tm_isdst case).

Hmm, that is interesting.  The problem may lie elsewhere then.
I'll let you know what I find out.

 - todd

More information about the tz mailing list