Question on abbreviations
tz. at explicate.org
Thu Sep 28 03:42:08 UTC 2006
First off, sorry for the duplicated post --- operator error.
I meant to be sending this correction:
On Wed, Sep 27, 2006 at 08:34:10PM -0700, Ken Pizzini wrote:
> Note that the offset that the rule transitions will continue on
> until the next transition occurs, no matter how far in the
> future of the FROM or TO years that may be.
There is a word missing there, and it is poorly worded anyway.
I meant something more like:
Note that the offset which results from a rule transition
specification will continue to be in effect until the next
transition occurs, no matter how far in the future of the
given FROM or TO years that may be.
That probably could still be worded better, but at least this version
is grammatically sensible.
More information about the tz