New home for time zone stuff by 2012?

[Dafydd Rhys-Jones]

Comments inline below.

-----Original Message-----
>I believe ado was requesting offers and comments for a new home for the >time 
>zone stuff. You and others may disagree with the UC idea while others may 
>agree with it  That is what an open discussion is all about.

You are absolutely correct, I hope I did not come off as sounding offensive. This was not intended.

>Yes, the current mechanism in the right hands (individual or consortium) >would 
>continue to work. As I stated, I would prefer a single source of tzdata and 
>not see this splintered into competing "standards". It would be good to >hear 
>what ado thinks about the discussion and direction of this thread.

I agree wholeheartedly, I was just offering alternatives.

>BTW, your name categorization was needless additional commentary. Please >stay 
>with the discussion thread without name innuendo.
>
>Mark
>

This is an open discussion, of which I will stay within, however I will add comment if I notice interesting anomalies.

Thank you,
Dafydd