little nuance in brazil 1963

Guilherme Rodrigues oguilherme at gmail.com
Wed Jan 6 16:35:48 UTC 2010


Ok, you are correct. Because you have historical data before 1970 I thought
you update data of this time. My Bad and congratulation such a complete
database for Brazil that has a caotic past of day light savings and zones.

Att, Guilherme


2010/1/6 Olson, Arthur David (NIH/NCI) [E] <olsona at dc37a.nci.nih.gov>

> If I'm correct in my checking, all the places in the "America/Sao_Paulo"
> zone have had the same wall clock time since 1970 (the UNIX epoch).
> We normally wouldn't normally create separate zones in this situation.
>
>                                --ado
>
> From: Guilherme Rodrigues [mailto:oguilherme at gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, January 04, 2010 2:18
> To: tz at lecserver.nci.nih.gov
> Subject: little nuance in brazil 1963
>
> Hi,
>     I notice a little nuance that would be nice be corrected, between
> 1963-10-23 and 1963-12-9 in brazil only Minas Gerais , Espirito Santo, Rio
> de Janeiro and Sao Paulo had sumer time. this can be verified in the links.
> http://pcdsh01.on.br/DecHV.html
> http://pcdsh01.on.br/HV52700.htm
> http://pcdsh01.on.br/HV53071.htm
>
>     I propose separate Zone America/Sao_Paulo in one more zone
> America/Brasilia, the configuration would be like:
> # Minas Gerais (MG), Espirito Santo (ES),
> # Rio de Janeiro (RJ), Sao Paulo (SP)
> Zone America/Sao_Paulo -3:06:28 - LMT 1914
>    -3:00 Brazil BR%sT 1963 Oct 23 00:00
>    -3:00 1:00 BRST 1964
>    -3:00 Brazil BR%sT
> # Goias (GO), Distrito Federal (DF),  Parana (PR),
> # Santa Catarina (SC), Rio Grande do Sul (RS)
> Zone America/Brasilia -3:06:28 - LMT 1914
>    -3:00 Brazil BR%sT 1963 Dec 9 00:00
>    -3:00 1:00 BRST 1964
>    -3:00 Brazil BR%sT
>
> Ps.:Sorry my poor english
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/tz/attachments/20100106/9aa3f386/attachment-0001.html 


More information about the tz mailing list