[tz] technical details for today's code and data release
tz at derickrethans.nl
Mon Jul 23 10:26:50 UTC 2012
On Sun, 22 Jul 2012, John Hawkinson wrote:
> > But it seems to indicate that we should go with two-faceted tags
> > (tz_codeX_dataY), to make this clear.
> I'd disagree.
> That would mean that to check out codeX, you would need to enumerate
> the list of tags to determine a matchign dataY.
> Better, I think, to have a codeX tag and a dataY tag and suffer the
> fact that a checkout of one will give you a
> close-but-potentially-unexpected other.
Exactly. However, we could always add the tz_codeX_dataY as *well* of
course... tags are cheap!
More information about the tz