[tz] Missing entry for Heard Island and MacDonald Islands

David Patte dpatte at relativedata.com
Fri May 11 20:17:45 UTC 2012


I also agree

On 2012-05-11 15:56, Paw Boel Nielsen wrote:
> I agree with Tobias a new zone for Heard Island and MacDonald Islands would be beneficial.
>
>>> Maybe because Etc/GMT-5 is adequate?
>> Systems that are set to use "Etc/GMT-5" will not observe a change even if HM changes.
> Paw
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: tz-bounces at iana.org [mailto:tz-bounces at iana.org] On Behalf Of Tobias Conradi
> Sent: 11 May 2012 21:44
> To: tz at iana.org
> Subject: Re: [tz] Missing entry for Heard Island and MacDonald Islands
>
> On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 7:21 PM, Ian Abbott<abbotti at mev.co.uk>  wrote:
>>> If so, why is HM not covered?
>> Maybe because Etc/GMT-5 is adequate?
> Systems that are set to use "Etc/GMT-5" will not observe a change even if HM changes.
>
> I don't know whether HM observed UTC+5 during all the time since 1970.
>
> That is an information the tzdb provides for many other ISO 3166-1 regions, but for HM it fails to do so.
>
> --
> Tobias Conradi
> Rheinsberger Str. 18
> 10115 Berlin
> Germany
>
> http://tobiasconradi.com/
>
>
>
>


-- 
  



More information about the tz mailing list