[tz] Proposal to change Macquarie Island to be Australian territory
tt at smartcomsoftware.com
Thu Apr 18 08:06:23 UTC 2013
Regarding in which region an island lies, a good approach is probably to
refer to the IHO (International Hydrographic Organisation) publication S-23
on the limits of oceans and seas. Unfortunately the current (1952) edition
removed the Antarctic or Southern Ocean as a separate region as it was
deemed to be an arbitrary delineation with no clear northern geographical
boundary. However work was done on a 4th Edition in 2000 which reinstated
the Southern Ocean and set the limits as 60 degrees South. This edition
would have been published and in force now, apart from a reservation from
So I would propose that any TZ data south of 60S, which means that Macquarie
Island does not fall in to Antarctica.
Smartcom Software Ltd
Portsmouth PO2 8FA
Smartcom Software is a limited company registered in England and Wales,
registered number 05641521.
From: tz-bounces at iana.org [mailto:tz-bounces at iana.org] On Behalf Of Russ
Sent: 18 April 2013 01:18
To: tz at iana.org
Subject: Re: [tz] Proposal to change Macquarie Island to be Australian
"David Grosz" <david at DLG.com.au> writes:
> I'm not sure if this is what the issue is but politically, Macquarie
> Island is part of Tasmania and as such, I would have thought it should
> be included under Australia.
Organization into the top-level structure is by continent or oceanic region,
not by political entity. Otherwise, it would be America/Honolulu, not
Pacific/Honolulu. That's why Paul's reply pointed out the ambiguity of
geographic classification, rather than focusing on the political
Classifying by political entity is a fast way to get us into trouble in more
politically contentious places. Consider Atlantic/Stanley, for example.
Australia is somewhat confusing in that context since it's both a political
entity and a continent.
Russ Allbery (rra at stanford.edu) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>
More information about the tz