[tz] [PATCH 2/4] Move obsolescent Americas entries to'backward'. [Scanned]
David Patte ₯
dpatte at relativedata.com
Wed Aug 28 11:54:58 UTC 2013
I also think its a shame that the proposed redefinition of 'tz region'
will cause the loss of so much historical data, which is being used by
many. I am also concerned with merging Atikokan region (north of Lake
Superior) into the Panama region, 5000 km, and a half dozen countries
away. I still don't see the proposed redefinition as valuable.
If this change is implemented, then a separate database of pre-1970 tz
data will be required my many users, as had been suggested (and started)
by Tobias Conradi (currently banned) and others. I guess there could be
two tz databases.
Paul, are you saying that other historical data has been removed from tz
in the past, as we might like to capture that old data as well into any
new pre-1970 database.
On 2013-08-28 7:34, Goudge, Stephen wrote:
> Lester Caine wrote
>> Stephen Colebourne wrote:
>>> Also, times before 1970 do matter. Whether you are certain or
>>> uncertain of the data is less important than not changing the data. In
>>> essence the TZDB has become the definition of what time was,
>>> irrespective of whether it is accurate or not. As such, history should
>>> only be changed if it is demonstratable that the original data was
>> One of my main problems has been getting a reliable base for historic
>> Many systems simply ignore dates prior to 1970, but a large number of us
>> are using genealogical databases and need to know that we are working
>> with the same numbers.
> I also value the pre-1970 data; although I can't claim an impressive user-base for my particular programs, there may well be a fair few projects out there that are quietly making good use of that data.
> Stephen Goudge
> Senior Software Engineer
> 390 Princesway
> Team Valley
> Tyne & Wear
> NE11 0TU
> T +44 (0) 191 420 3015
> F +44 (0) 191 420 3030
> W www.petards.com
> This email has been sent from Petards Group plc or a member of the Petards group of companies. The information in this email is confidential and/or privileged. It is intended solely for the use of the addressee. Access to this email by anyone else is unauthorised. If you are not the intended recipient, any review, dissemination, disclosure, alteration, printing, circulation or transmission of this e-mail and/or any file or attachment transmitted with it, is prohibited and may be unlawful.
> Petards Group plc is registered in England & Wales. Company No. 2990100
> Petards Limited is registered in England & Wales. Company No. 2301063
> Petards Joyce-Loebl Limited is registered in England & Wales. Company No. 2170100
> Registered Offices: 390 Princesway, Team Valley, Gateshead, Tyne & Wear NE11 0TU, UK.
> This email has been scanned by Petards. The service is powered by Symantec MessageLabs Email AntiVirus.cloud
More information about the tz