On 03/06/2013 07:42 AM, Christos Zoulas wrote: > You are claiming that MSVC has int_fast64_t and does not have intmax_t? > [I think it lacking both] It shouldn't matter. If we change zic.c to use intmax_t, we'll also change private.h to define intmax_t on older compilers that lack it, just as we already do with int_fast64_t.