[tz] dead code in zic

Paul Eggert eggert at cs.ucla.edu
Thu Mar 7 04:13:31 UTC 2013

On 03/06/2013 07:42 AM, Christos Zoulas wrote:
> You are claiming that MSVC has int_fast64_t and does not have intmax_t?
> [I think it lacking both]

It shouldn't matter.  If we change zic.c to use intmax_t,
we'll also change private.h to define intmax_t on older compilers
that lack it, just as we already do with int_fast64_t.

More information about the tz mailing list