[tz] Large scale changes proposed in 2014f
eggert at cs.ucla.edu
Fri Aug 1 01:03:41 UTC 2014
Lester Caine wrote:
> We NEED an historically correct set of data which I had thought that was
> now accepted, but it seems not?
We've talked in the past about adding hooks for extra pre-1970 data,
presumably mainly for astrological applications. As long as they don't
significantly get in the way of the main database (whose scope is areas
that have agreed since 1970), I don't think people would have a problem
with that. It would be a nontrivial task, though.
More information about the tz