[tz] Crimea to switch to Moscow Time as of March 30, 2014

Julian Cable julian.cable at bbc.co.uk
Mon Mar 17 18:39:39 UTC 2014

Yes, I would, which suggests that a 'disputed' country is a bad idea, but that putting the zones in each country works better.

It is important to NOT choose.


-----Original Message-----
From: Paul_Koning at Dell.com [mailto:Paul_Koning at Dell.com]
Sent: 17 March 2014 18:36
To: Julian Cable
Subject: Re: [tz] Crimea to switch to Moscow Time as of March 30, 2014

On Mar 17, 2014, at 2:29 PM, Julian Cable <julian.cable at bbc.co.uk> wrote:

> I don't think an authority is needed to approve the existence of a dispute.

Would you mark "disputed" no matter who makes the claim of dispute?  If yes, you would end up with so many entries that it becomes pointless.  If no, then you're choosing authorities - those whose marking you would accept.

Is South Korea disputed?  Kim III would probably say it is.  Is Taiwan disputed?  Crimea?  Israel?


This e-mail (and any attachments) is confidential and
may contain personal views which are not the views of the BBC unless specifically stated.
If you have received it in
error, please delete it from your system.
Do not use, copy or disclose the
information in any way nor act in reliance on it and notify the sender
Please note that the BBC monitors e-mails
sent or received.
Further communication will signify your consent to

More information about the tz mailing list