[tz] historic sub-second time offsets
eggert at cs.ucla.edu
Wed Nov 5 21:29:57 UTC 2014
On 11/05/2014 12:30 PM, Steve Allen wrote:
> BIH was perennially under-staffed, under-funded, months to a year
> arrears in publishing
I can certainly identify with that!
Thanks for the info. So, it appears that HTML5 authors and readers are
not supposed to use definitive circa-1960 civil time stamps. They are
supposed to use astronomical time stamps instead. Astronomers rule!
This can't be what was intended. I have submitted a bug report against
the HTML5 spec about this, here:
More information about the tz