[tz] Chile TZ rule 1942 June superfluous? PS
michael.deckers at yahoo.com
Tue Mar 31 11:18:51 UTC 2015
On 2015-03-29 18:46, Paul Eggert wrote about the Chile rules:
> Yes, that's right. The line mentioning "Jul 15" can be removed without changing
> the meaning of the data. I don't know why that line is there, but I suppose we
> can remove it.
The same seems to hold true for the line
Rule Chile 1947 only - Apr 1 4:00u 0 -
because its precursor
Rule Chile 1946 only - Sep 1 3:00u 0:00 -
does the same, and (current) usage of the Chile rules never
starts after 1946-09-01T03Z and on or before 1947-04-01T04Z.
More information about the tz