[tz] Joda-Time, Time4J, and Java SE 8

[Stephen Colebourne]

Looks reasonable to me.
thanks
Stephen

On 19 July 2016 at 13:39, Paul Eggert <eggert at cs.ucla.edu> wrote:
> On 07/08/2016 01:34 PM, Stephen Colebourne wrote:
>>
>> I would recommend keeping the Time4J line in tzlink separate from the
>> Joda-Time/Java 8 line, as while Joda-Time and Java 8 have a lot in
>> common, Time4J doesn't have any history in common at all. It also
>> allows you to simplify the license part, which is complex as written.
>
>
> Thanks, I tried to take all that into account by installing the attached
> patch. This also adds a subsection for Java to try to organize things a bit
> better (much as we've already done for JavaScript).