[tz] [PROPOSED] Use more up-to-date citation for leap seconds
eggert at cs.ucla.edu
Tue Jul 18 00:46:55 UTC 2017
Matthew Donadio wrote:
> Wouldhttp://www.ursi.org/content/RSB/RSB_359_2016_12.pdf be a better
> reference? I know the article is open access on IEEE Xplore, but wouldn't
> the URSI one be canonical and always available?
The URSI URL is for the entire issue, which is a bit off-putting. I doubt
whether the IEEE Xplore version will go away any time soon; if it does, we can
Ironically, the canonical URL does not work:
I filed a bug report for that.
More information about the tz