[tz] Was there a 1971-12-31 23:59:60?
sla at ucolick.org
Sun Nov 11 05:23:56 UTC 2018
On Sat 2018-11-10T19:54:11+0000 Levine, Judah Dr. (Fed) hath writ:
> It is quite challenging to compute time intervals in the pre-1972
That depends on the required precision.
It is still challenging to compute intervals to nanoseconds.
That requires grabbing all the relevant issues of BIPM Circular T
and similar publications of the particular source of time if they
are not members of the BIPM atomic clock club.
One hundred years ago it was challenging to compute intervals to
centiseconds, and that was the reason for the creation of BIH.
When Anna Stoyko retired from the BIH in 1965 she published one final
analysis of all the BIH data from 1922 to 1963. She produced plots
showing how the time services of observatories had improved.
Those plots are reproduced here
In order to gather these data the BIH had been monitoring the arrival
times of radio broadcast time signals since 1922. The volumes of
Bulletin Horaire have the numbers that show many ways that various
national observatories and time services messed up (and messed around
with) the time they were providing.
The data in the issues of Bulletin Horaire are the nightmare of the
tzdb because taken to the absurd limit they would require that tzdb
encode the millisecond-scale differences between the legal civil times
of every nation whose transmitters were monitored by BIH.
> Different timing laboratories had slightly different values for this
> final time step. The goal was to bring all of the real-time
> realizations of UTC to the same time.
Well, much closer than before, but if they were the same then the
subsequent issues of BIH Bulletin Horaire and now BIPM Circular T
would be much terser publications.
Steve Allen <sla at ucolick.org> WGS-84 (GPS)
UCO/Lick Observatory--ISB 260 Natural Sciences II, Room 165 Lat +36.99855
1156 High Street Voice: +1 831 459 3046 Lng -122.06015
Santa Cruz, CA 95064 http://www.ucolick.org/~sla/ Hgt +250 m
More information about the tz