[tz] Fwd: Bulletin C number 57
Brian.Inglis at SystematicSw.ab.ca
Thu Jan 31 18:38:17 UTC 2019
On 2019-01-07 23:39, Paul Eggert wrote:
> Brian Inglis wrote:
>> suggests CC-PDM, CC0, ODC-PDDL, OGL, or EUPL may be suitable depending on which
>> explicit permissions are required and whether obligations should be applied.
>> Which of these are preferred by the masintainer?
> The intent of the tzdb (see Internet RFC 6657 section 7) is that it be in the
> public domain, so CC-PDM sounds like it's the most-appropriate. CC-BY 4.0 places
> more requirements than what RFC 6657 would allow, so it would be more problematic.
Publications Office of the European Union Open Data Portal Helpdesk says
"After careful consideration of your request, we are sorry to inform you that
these datasets are produced by an international specialised body so we are
unable to publish them in ODP."
Take care. Thanks, Brian Inglis, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
This email may be disturbing to some readers as it contains
too much technical detail. Reader discretion is advised.
More information about the tz