[tz] [PROPOSED] Rename asctime symbols if required in private.h

Paul Eggert eggert at cs.ucla.edu
Tue Oct 15 16:54:15 UTC 2019

On 10/15/19 4:24 AM, Roland Young wrote:

> Note: if my assumption about "other cases" is wrong, the preprocessor guards in
> this patch should be omitted.

Thanks, I installed the patch without the preprocessor guards (see attached) 
since I don't see why asctime/asctime_r should be different from ctime/ctime_r etc.

RESERVE_STD_EXT_IDS is not the only reason that the symbols might be renaming; 
it could be that the symbols are not reserved but you want to rename them 
anyway. If I am missing something and a fix is needed here, it can be the 
subject of a separate patch.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 0001-Rename-asctime-symbols-if-required-in-private.h.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 1068 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/tz/attachments/20191015/43478bee/attachment.bin>

More information about the tz mailing list