[tz] Pre-1970 data
philip at trouble.is
Fri Nov 5 05:11:26 UTC 2021
On 2021-11-05 12:17:34 (+0800), Brian Park via tz wrote:
> I get the impression that this debate is caused by the existence of 2
> different schools of thought: [...]
> I want to suggest that it may be possible for these 2 views to
They de facto coexist right now. The overwhelming majority of the data
are descriptive. Only recent efforts have made some of the post-1970
data appear more prescriptive.
> could create a new file, e.g. call it 'countryzone', which contains a
> of Links organized in a hierarchical tree by country, pointing to the
I strongly believe we should continue to carefully avoid attempting to
group data by country. [I would even avoid using the word "country"
> For the pre-1970 data, it is my understanding that the 'backzone' file
> contains Zone records which should replace ONLY the LinkMerged records
> found in the other files. I propose that all LinkMerged records be
> extracted into a separate file (let's call it 'mergedzone') so that
> is a clear symmetry between 'backzone' and 'mergedzone', which allows
> to be substituted for each other. The dependency diagram looks
> like this:
As I've suggested before in another thread, I think we should consider
undoing the split into backzone. I really liked Stephen's phrasing
earlier in this thread: acceptably accurate, not outrageously wrong. We
started moving data to backzone to limit the scope of 'active'
maintenance to post-1970 data. That artificial split led us towards a
more prescriptive worldview. It seems clear that prescriptive simply
does not work for a real world with people on it.
> If there is any chance that this will result in being able to type
> "Canada/Toronto" instead of "America/Toronto", that would resolve an
> annoyance that has lasted some 30-35 years.
In this context, America refers to the landmass, not to the political
entity occupying a large chunk of it. [Canada/Eastern etc moved to
backward around 1993, as far as I can tell.]
Trying to group by country would only lead to (more) divisive arguments.
I do support the notion that we should have at least one time zone
identifier per ISO code though (whether or not that code refers to a
Senior Reality Engineer
More information about the tz