[tz] Proposal: Sections for different kinds of backward links

Paul Eggert eggert at cs.ucla.edu
Sun Nov 14 21:17:42 UTC 2021

On 11/14/21 04:16, Stephen Colebourne via tz wrote:

> The distinction between `obsolescent` and `other` seems unnecessary -
> they are all IDs no longer suitable for use.

We could merge the two into a single category 'obsolescent'.

> I need to be able to indicate which spelling users
> should use.

That info is already in zone.tab's column 3. Although that file is 
marked "deprecated", perhaps we can undeprecate it.

More information about the tz mailing list