[tz] permanent DST and North American time zone names
tim at timtimeonline.com
Wed Mar 16 16:03:57 UTC 2022
On Wed, 16 Mar 2022 at 11:47, Chris Walton <crj.walton at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 16, 2022 at 11:15 AM Tim Parenti via tz <tz at iana.org> wrote:
>> Complicating matters somewhat is that, because of the prevalence of tzdb,
>> in a sense we're "victims of our own success". That is, whatever we end up
>> picking will likely show up fairly automatically in a lot of public-facing
>> places, and so even if it isn't what the public would've naturally used in
>> the immediate aftermath of a change, many will be fairly quickly informed
>> by what they start to see, and may start adopting and spreading whatever
>> nomenclature we've picked.
> This is a good thing. It is my opinion that the people who are best able
> to choose the time zone names and abbreviations are those that have the
> complete understanding of all North American time zone practices and
> idiosyncrasies. Those people happen to be the members of this mailing list.
> If decisions on standard time zone naming are left up to the politicians
> and the general public, the results will be unpredictable and inconsistent.
Sure, but it *is* fundamentally at odds with the prevailing idea that we
aim to be descriptive, not prescriptive. There is certainly always a role,
though, for us to be good stewards and use our expertise to help guide best
practices, so it's inevitably a balancing act. But we need to be
clear-eyed that there is balancing being done and, as such, maintain the
flexibility needed to manage that push and pull.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the tz