<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
On 9/18/2011 11:07 AM, Tobias Conradi wrote:
<blockquote class=" cite"
id="mid_%20%3CCAAGevbXua6hBjHeCU9Kd50yYwya=29reEvsKXdJyJ0789+ghPw_mail_gmail_com"
cite="mid:%20%3CCAAGevbXua6hBjHeCU9Kd50yYwya=29reEvsKXdJyJ0789+ghPw@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
According to
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://efele.net/maps/tz/russia/">http://efele.net/maps/tz/russia/</a> 2011b
the area shown as Bulunskij in Wikipedia is separated
between Asia/Yakutsk MSK+6 and
Asia/Vladivostok MSK+7.
</blockquote>
<br>
Please don't use this map as an authority. My separation of the
artic islands from the rest of Bulunskij is actually an artifact of
the map I used to get boundaries of districts. In that map, the
artic islands are not identified as "belonging" any district; I
assigned them to the Asia/Vladivostok zone only because there are
directly north of the Ust-Yanskiy district, which is in that zone. <br>
<br>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">[russian and english wikipedia pages for the subdivisions of Sakha] both use the same map which shows Bulunskij as including the New
Siberian Islands.</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
Incidentally, the French page
(<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Subdivisions_de_Sakha">http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Subdivisions_de_Sakha</a>) clearly states
that the New Siberian islands are a natural preserve, under direct
authority of the Sakha republic, and are not part of any district. <br>
<br>
Eric.<br>
<br>
</body>
</html>