I don't think we can rely on country/UN as the only input. Consider what happened in Argentina a couple of years ago, when summer time was decreed by the central federal government but was not followed by San Luis and other provinces. If we were to only rely on country input we would have probably missed the other side of the story.<br>
<br>Un abrazo,<br><br> Carlos Perasso<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 09:07, Philip Newton <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:philip.newton@gmail.com">philip.newton@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;"><div class="im">On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 13:45, <<a href="mailto:Paul_Koning@dell.com">Paul_Koning@dell.com</a>> wrote:<br>
> It also implies that the discussion in another thread (ask the UN for help)<br>
> is not likely to be the effective answer. It has all the problems Kevin<br>
> described, just for starters.<br>
<br>
</div>If country/UN input were the only input, then yes. If it is just an<br>
additional source of input, perhaps even one that is more timely and<br>
authoritative, then I think not. It would be up to the coordinator to<br>
act as editor and choose which updates to accept and which to reject,<br>
just like now, or so I envision it.<br>
<div><div></div><div class="h5"><br>
Cheers,<br>
Philip<br>
--<br>
Philip Newton <<a href="mailto:philip.newton@gmail.com">philip.newton@gmail.com</a>><br>
<br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br>