<br><div class="gmail_quote">On Sat, Oct 27, 2012 at 7:08 AM, Christos Zoulas <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:christos@zoulas.com" target="_blank">christos@zoulas.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
On Oct 26, 11:22pm, <a href="mailto:eggert@cs.ucla.edu" target="_blank">eggert@cs.ucla.edu</a> (Paul Eggert) wrote:<br>
-- Subject: [tz] tzcode2012h and tzdata2012h available<br>
<div><br>
| More C modernization, except that at Arthur David Olson's suggestion<br>
| the instances of 'register' were kept.<br>
<br>
</div>Wonderful. Will you accept a patch then to add all the missing<br>
"register" adornments (because that is what they are) for the rest<br>
of the variables whose address is not taken? And please, point out<br>
to me another opensource package that still uses register, because<br>
I am stressed to find one.</blockquote><div><br>Don't stress; ignore the register annotations. And no, adorning everything that does not have its address taken with register would not be sensible.<br><br>I hope Paul won't accept the patch; I recommend not even bothering to create it. Relax. The presence of the register keyword won't hurt anything.<br>
</div></div><br>-- <br>Jonathan Leffler <<a href="mailto:jonathan.leffler@gmail.com" target="_blank">jonathan.leffler@gmail.com</a>> #include <disclaimer.h><br>Guardian of DBD::Informix - v2011.0612 - <a href="http://dbi.perl.org" target="_blank">http://dbi.perl.org</a><br>
"Blessed are we who can laugh at ourselves, for we shall never cease to be amused."<br>