<div dir="ltr">On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 12:20 PM, Stephen Colebourne <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:scolebourne@joda.org" target="_blank">scolebourne@joda.org</a>></span> wrote:<br><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote">
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">They contain completely different data, and the 1970 argument simply<br>
won't wash. Many users will have stored data in databases or other<br>
long term storage that refers to these time-zones being made obsolete.<br>
When they read the data back, they will get completely different times<br>
for historic events - utterly unacceptable.<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>I second this -- we actively use the database for *all* dates, including those pre-1970 because historical financial information extends back to 1895 in some cases. There is no other database that captures this data accurately. If the IANA tz database is shrugging off all the work that went into making this database what it is, we'll have no choice but to fork it.</div>
<div><br></div><div>-Andrew</div></div></div></div>