<div dir="ltr"><div><div>The previous decree sounded more like a "this year only" rule, even though it was meant to be a permanent rule:<br>cuarto domingo del mes de marzo del presente año - fourth Sunday of March of this year<br>
<br>Now it is better written:<br>cuarto domingo del mes de marzo de cada año - fourth Sunday of March of every year<br><br></div>I guess that was it.<br><br></div><div>I think that the new decree number should be included anyway.<br>
</div><div><br>Best regards,<br><br></div>Carlos<br></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 9:22 AM, Ciro Iriarte <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:cyruspy@gmail.com" target="_blank">cyruspy@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">I was talking about my patch, which is not needed :)<br>
<br>
Anyway, apparently there's no difference in the rules of the two<br>
decrees, any idea what changed?<br>
<br>
Regards,<br>
Ciro<br>
<br>
2014-02-28 15:47 GMT-03:00 Carlos Raúl Perasso <<a href="mailto:crperasso@gmail.com">crperasso@gmail.com</a>>:<br>
<div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5">> It's not an attachment, it's a link to the official decree's scan. The<br>
> previous decree (10780) can be found at:<br>
><br>
> <a href="http://www.pgr.gov.py/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/Decreto-10780.pdf" target="_blank">http://www.pgr.gov.py/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/Decreto-10780.pdf</a><br>
><br>
> Cheers!<br>
><br>
> Carlos<br>
><br>
><br>
> On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 3:22 PM, Ciro Iriarte <<a href="mailto:cyruspy@gmail.com">cyruspy@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
>><br>
>> Hmm, I see that the attachment didn't make it to the list, and double<br>
>> checking I also see you're right, although I cannot find the previous<br>
>> decree (19780) to check what's the difference O_o.<br>
>><br>
>> Thanks!<br>
>><br>
>> Regards,<br>
>> CI.-<br>
>><br>
>> 2014-02-28 13:42 GMT-03:00 Carlos Raúl Perasso <<a href="mailto:crperasso@gmail.com">crperasso@gmail.com</a>>:<br>
>> > The decree issued doesn't really chance any rule (fortunately), so it<br>
>> > should<br>
>> > only be a commentary addition. Decree 1264 can be found at:<br>
>> ><br>
>> ><br>
>> > <a href="http://www.presidencia.gov.py/archivos/documentos/DECRETO1264_ey9r8zai.pdf" target="_blank">http://www.presidencia.gov.py/archivos/documentos/DECRETO1264_ey9r8zai.pdf</a><br>
>> ><br>
>> > Best regards,<br>
>> ><br>
>> > Carlos Perasso<br>
>> ><br>
>> ><br>
>> > On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 11:26 AM, Ciro Iriarte <<a href="mailto:cyruspy@gmail.com">cyruspy@gmail.com</a>><br>
>> > wrote:<br>
>> >><br>
>> >> The paraguayan government decided to change once more the DST rule<br>
>> >> this year, please find enclosed a patch to be reviewed and included in<br>
>> >> "southamerica" zone file to accommodate this change.<br>
>> >><br>
>> >> Regards,<br>
>> >><br>
>> >> --<br>
>> >> Ciro Iriarte<br>
>> >> <a href="http://iriarte.it" target="_blank">http://iriarte.it</a><br>
>> >> --<br>
>> ><br>
>> ><br>
>><br>
>><br>
>><br>
>> --<br>
>> Ciro Iriarte<br>
>> <a href="http://iriarte.it" target="_blank">http://iriarte.it</a><br>
>> --<br>
><br>
><br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
--<br>
Ciro Iriarte<br>
<a href="http://iriarte.it" target="_blank">http://iriarte.it</a><br>
--<br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div>