<html>
<head>
<style><!--
.hmmessage P
{
margin:0px;
padding:0px
}
body.hmmessage
{
font-size: 12pt;
font-family:Calibri
}
--></style></head>
<body class='hmmessage'><div dir='ltr'>I think there are other places affected by this also. Where I noticed was in the CLDR, as discussed here:<div><a href="http://stackoverflow.com/a/24395573/634824" target="_blank">http://stackoverflow.com/a/24395573/634824</a></div><div><br><br><div>> Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2014 14:02:10 -0700<br>> From: eggert@cs.ucla.edu<br>> To: tz@iana.org<br>> CC: mj1856@hotmail.com<br>> Subject: 'date -u' should say "UTC", not "GMT"<br>> <br>> Come to think of it, the tz implementation of 'date -u' should say "UTC" <br>> instead of "GMT", and in general the tz code and documentation should <br>> prefer UT or UTC to GMT whenever this would improve technical accuracy. <br>> Although "GMT" is the traditional time zone abbreviation output of 'date <br>> -u', POSIX has allowed "UTC" ever since IEEE Std 1003.1-1992. <br>> Outputting "UTC" is more technically correct, certainly for time stamps <br>> since 1961, and arguably even before that if one interprets "UTC" <br>> proleptically. Also, outputting "UTC" is now a quite-common behavior, <br>> since it's the standard behavior in GNU/Linux. So I'll look into <br>> proposing a patch to the tz code to have it support this behavior. <br>> There are probably a few other places in the code that should also <br>> prefer "UT" or "UTC" to "GMT".<br></div></div> </div></body>
</html>